WIDA Framework Quick Reference Guide
WIDA Framework
Quick Reference Guide
Standards • Domains • Key Language Uses • Proficiency Levels • Assessments
WIDA is not just one thing — it’s an entire ecosystem for English Language Development. Here’s what falls under the WIDA umbrella:
Component | What It Is | Why It Matters |
Consortium | Multi-state organization (40+ states & territories) housed at UW-Madison | Virginia is a member — WIDA standards & assessments are used statewide |
ELD Standards Framework | The 2020 ELD Standards Framework: 5 standards + Key Language Uses + proficiency levels | The core of everything — drives curriculum, instruction, and assessment for ELs |
Assessment System | ACCESS for ELLs, WIDA Screener, Alternate ACCESS, MODEL | Determines EL identification, proficiency levels, and program exit |
Professional Learning | Workshops, online courses, WIDA eLearning, research publications | Ongoing PD for educators working with multilingual learners |
Research Center | University of Wisconsin-Madison research hub | Informs evidence-based practices for EL instruction |
Each standard represents a content area where English learners develop academic language:
# | Standard | Focus | Example Language Demand |
1 | Social & Instructional Language | Language for navigating school, peer interactions, and classroom routines | Asking clarifying questions, following multi-step directions, collaborating in groups |
2 | Language of Language Arts | Language for ELA content: literature, informational text, writing | Analyzing character motivation, citing text evidence, constructing arguments |
3 | Language of Mathematics | Language for math concepts, problem-solving, and reasoning | Explaining solution strategies, interpreting word problems, justifying answers |
4 | Language of Science | Language for scientific inquiry, experiments, and phenomena | Describing observations, forming hypotheses, analyzing data patterns |
5 | Language of Social Studies | Language for history, geography, civics, and economics | Comparing perspectives, evaluating primary sources, explaining cause and effect |
This is the most commonly confused distinction. Domains and KLUs are two completely different dimensions of language:
THE 4 DOMAINS | THE 4 KEY LANGUAGE USES |
The HOW — the channels through which language is delivered Think: Modalities | The WHY — the purposes for which language is used Think: Functions (new in 2020 Framework) |
|
|
Tested on: ACCESS for ELLs (scores reported by domain) | Used for: Instructional planning — identifying language demands in content |
Domains and KLUs intersect — students use a domain FOR a KLU purpose. Here are classroom examples:
Domain | KLU | Classroom Example |
Speaking | Argue | Student verbally defends their position in a Socratic seminar on immigration policy |
Writing | Explain | Student writes a lab report explaining why the plant in sunlight grew taller |
Reading | Narrate | Student reads a historical narrative about a soldier’s experience in WWI |
Listening | Inform | Student listens to a teacher’s presentation on the branches of government |
Writing | Argue | Student writes a persuasive essay using text evidence to support a claim |
Speaking | Narrate | Student retells a personal experience during a morning circle share |
WIDA uses six proficiency levels (PLs) to describe a student’s English language development:
PL | Label | Student Can… | Instructional Implication |
1 | Entering | Use single words, memorized phrases; point, draw, gesture to communicate | Visuals, word banks, sentence frames, gestures, L1 support, labeled diagrams |
2 | Emerging | Use phrases and short sentences; participate with heavy scaffolding | Graphic organizers, word/picture banks, partner work, simplified texts |
3 | Developing | Use simple and some complex sentences; engage in content with moderate support | Sentence starters, collaborative structures, adapted grade-level texts |
4 | Expanding | Use a variety of sentence structures; engage with grade-level content with some support | Strategic scaffolding, pre-teaching key vocabulary, structured academic discussions |
5 | Bridging | Use technical and academic language; communicate with minimal errors near grade-level peers | Minimal scaffolding, focus on nuance and precision, content-area vocabulary refinement |
6 | Reaching | Use language comparable to English-proficient peers across content areas | Monitor for continued success; may still benefit from targeted academic language support |
Assessment | Purpose | When Used | What It Measures |
WIDA Screener | Identification — determine if a student qualifies for EL services | At enrollment when Home Language Survey indicates a language other than English | All 4 domains: Listening, Speaking, Reading, Writing |
ACCESS for ELLs | Annual summative — measure ELP growth and determine program exit | Annually (Jan–March) for all identified ELs in WIDA states | All 4 domains; reports Overall Composite, Oral, Literacy scores (PLs 1–6) |
Alternate ACCESS | For ELs with significant cognitive disabilities | Same window as ACCESS | Modified proficiency levels (A1–A3, P1–P2) |
WIDA MODEL | Interim/diagnostic — formative check on student progress | As needed throughout the year (not required) | All 4 domains; mirrors ACCESS format |
A quick-reference for the terms that trip everyone up:
Term | What It Actually Means | Common Mix-Up |
Domains | The 4 language modalities: Listening, Speaking, Reading, Writing | Often confused with KLUs or with the 5 ELD Standards |
Key Language Uses | The 4 purposes: Narrate, Inform, Explain, Argue | Often confused with Domains; KLUs are about purpose, not modality |
Standards (1–5) | Content-area language expectations (Social, ELA, Math, Science, SS) | Not the same as proficiency levels or domains |
Proficiency Levels | The 1–6 scale: Entering → Reaching | Not the same as Standards (1–5); PLs describe student ability, Standards describe content areas |
Can Do Descriptors | Descriptions of what students CAN do at each proficiency level, by grade cluster and domain | Sometimes mistaken for the standards themselves; they’re a tool FOR the standards |
ACCESS Scores | Overall Composite, Oral (L+S), Literacy (R+W), and individual domain scores | Composite ≠ average of all four; it’s a weighted combination |
Quick Connection to Your Practice: The KLUs map beautifully onto Jeff Zwiers’ academic conversation framework. “Argue” lives in constructive conversation territory; “Explain” aligns with elaboration and clarification moves. When planning lessons, identify the KLU first, then scaffold the domain(s) students will use to get there.
Pro Tip for Interviews: Being able to articulate the difference between Domains and KLUs signals that you know the 2020 framework deeply — most candidates can’t.
Page